|
In the previous installments we reviewed the basic
advantages of effective perioperative, multimodal pain control. Analgesics
coupled with sedative/tranquilizers provide a more comfortable patient and
staff experience, reduce induction and maintenance agent requirements, and
generally improve patient morbidity and mortality. Multimodal techniques
reduce the dose of each individual drug which, in turn, reduces the
potential for adverse drug effects. Intervening before the pain system
becomes sensitized is an absolute necessity when your goal is optimal
patient benefit. In Part IV, we will continue our review of the various
drug families, individual agents, and drug delivery methods that
contribute to perioperative patient analgesic management.
LOCAL
ANESTHETICS including lidocaine, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine
are inexpensive and versatile analgesic tools that may be incorporated
into area infiltrations, regional blocks, and epidural injections. By
reducing the pain response at the local level it is possible to
significantly reduce the general anesthetic requirements of the patients
likely improving their anesthetic stability as well as their overall
postoperative comfort level. Lidocaine (and only lidocaine) can also be an
effective analgesic when given as a constant rate IV infusion. Bupivacaine
possesses significant potential for cardiotoxicity when given
intravenously. Ropivacaine is less cardiotoxic but it too should not be
administered intravenously.
Local anesthetic agents are particularly attractive
when performing oral surgery, amputations (nerve transections),
thoracotomies (intercostals blocks and intrapleural infusions), orthopedic
surgeries (joint infusions), declawing cats (ring blocks), and when
neutering dogs and cats (intratesticular blocks). The fast acting, shorter
duration agents (lidocaine) can be combined with the slower acting, longer
duration agents (bupivacaine, ropivacaine) for best effect. Adding a small
amount of opioid (0.075 mg/kg morphine or 0.003 mg/kg buprenorphine) to
the local anesthetic mix may substantially extend the duration of
analgesia obtained[i],[ii].
Epinephrine can also be added to the local anesthetic in hopes of
improving its local retention and extending the duration of effect, but
epinephrine should never be used to perform a ring block on distal
extremities.
Local anesthetics can be associated with significant
adverse effects if they are not dosed and administered properly.
Initially, overdoes are signaled by seizure activity in awake patients,
but, even more seriously, cardiac depression and cardiovascular collapse
can occur at high doses especially when given intravenously. It
is generally felt that there is additive toxicity between the local
anesthetics. Establishing a maximum dose, diluting as needed to
provide adequate volume, and aspirating prior to injection should easily
avoid adverse CNS and cardiac events. To avoid ischemic compromise,
never use epinephrine containing local anesthetics when performing ring
blocks on the extremities including the tail.
Lidocaine, unlike bupivacaine and ropivacaine,
has a very quick onset but its duration of effect is limited to 1 to 1 1/2
hours. Stock solution can produce an intense burning pain in conscious
patients. Mixing 9 parts lidocaine with 1 part sodium bicarbonate can
reduce this discomfort. Doses of lidocaine up to 5 mg/kg in dogs and up to
2.5 mg/kg in cats are considered safe for general infiltrative use. If
larger volumes are required to cover a region, you may dilute the
lidocaine with 1 to 3 equal parts of sterile water without losing
reasonable effectiveness.
Bupivacaine has a more delayed
onset but a much longer duration compared to lidocaine. Initial sensory
block may take 15 to 30 minutes for full effect. This delay is often
overlooked by the surgeon and inadequate time allowed for anesthetic
effect. By combining lidocaine with bupivacaine you can gain the best
qualities of both products and avoid unnecessary procedural delays. Doses
of bupivacaine up to 2.0 mg/kg in dogs and up to 1.5 mg/kg in cats are
considered safe for general infiltrative use. When combining lidocaine
with bupivacaine the easiest formula is to use 1 mg/kg of each drug. If
larger volumes are needed simply dilute the agent(s) as described for
lidocaine above.
Ropivacaine is a newer amide class local
anesthetic with a faster onset than bupivacaine and longer duration than
lidocaine. It is less cardiotoxic than bupivacaine and may be somewhat
more selective for sensory rather than motor nerves; a quality that is
attractive when performing epidurals. Ropivacaine is more expensive than
lidocaine and bupivacaine. Ropivacaine is dosed at up
to 2.0 mg/kg in dogs and up to 1.5 mg/kg in cats.
Declaw ring blocks are performed using a
combination of lidocaine and bupivacaine or ropivacaine. Add 1 mg/kg of
each into a syringe. Add sterile water as needed to total 1 cc in cats up
to 2.3 kilograms and 2 cc in cats over 2.3 kilograms, then divide into 6
equal amounts injecting, after aspirating, at the locations shown below. Make sure you do NOT use an epinephrine-containing agent in an extremity
ring block or ischemia of the extremity will result. |
|
Dental nerve blocks are an important tool for
managing anesthetic safety and patient comfort especially in aged pets
less tolerant of higher general anesthetic levels. Add 1 mg/kg each of
lidocaine and bupivacaine to a syringe adding sterile water as described
above for larger volumes. Inject 0.2 to 1.0 cc per site proportional to
patient size at the appropriate sites as shown below. For a more caudal
maxillary block place the needle further into the infraorbital canal,
aspirate, then apply pressure with your finger over the infraorbital
foramen while injecting the solution.
|
Infraorbital
Foramen Block
|
|

|

|
|
|
|
Mandibular
Block
|
|

|

|
|
|
|
Mental
Foramen Block
|
|

|

|
|
|
|
Photos
courtesy of Laura McLain Madsen, D.V.M.
|
Intercostal nerve blocks are effective for
managing pain after thoracotomy surgery or thoracic wall trauma. Using the
standard 1 mg/kg dose of each local anesthetic drug, inject 0.1 to 0.3 ml
per site in small dogs and cats, 0.5 to 1.0 ml per site in larger
patients. Dilute with sterile water if needed to achieve adequate volume.
Block 2 spaces cranial and 2 spaces caudal to the surgical incision along
the caudal border of each rib near the level of the intervertebral foramen
Intrapleural
infusions can improve patient comfort significantly in the
postoperative period. The initial dose should include up to 1.5 mg/kg
lidocaine and up to 1.5 mg/kg bupivacaine, keeping in mind total patient
dose of all overlapping local anesthetics. When infusing through a chest
tube follow the local anesthetic with 2 to 5 ml saline to flush the tube.
This infusion can be repeated every 3 to 6 hours typically using
bupivacaine or ropivacaine alone for repeat dosing.
Intra-articular injections are
very useful when performing joint surgery, especially cranial cruciate
related procedures. Lidocaine is well suited to administration prior to
the arthrotomy. Depending on patient size, 1 to 6 ml may be placed inside
the joint after careful aseptic prep. Epinephrine containing lidocaine
solutions can be used preop to reduce intraoperative hemorrhage. After
joint closure, 1 to 6 ml of bupivacaine or ropivacaine may be placed
inside the joint to provide sustained postsurgical relief. As previously
outlined, adding 0.003 mg/kg buprenorphine or 0.075 mg/kg morphine to the
local anesthetic will likely extend the total analgesic duration of the
intra-articular block.
Intratesticular injections of
local anesthetics provide a major intraoperative patient benefit. With an
IT block in place you avoid the sudden patient arousal not uncommonly seen
when clamping the spermatic cord as well as providing significant
isoflurane/sevoflurane MAC reduction predictably improving patient
cardiovascular and respiratory dynamics. IT blocks are quickly and easily
administered after patient clip and rough prep. Combining 1 mg/kg of
lidocaine with 1 mg/kg of bupivacaine or ropivacaine and add 0.003 mg/kg
buprenorphine or 0.075 mg/kg morphine for the best patient benefit.
Use a 25g 5/8” needle for most cats and a 22g 1 to 1 ½”
needle for dogs and large cats. Place the needle through the testicle
starting from the caudal pole aiming for the spermatic cord. It is OK,
even desirable, for the needle to exit the testicle proximally as it is
the spermatic cord that will receive the direct clamp stimulation. ASPIRATE
BEFORE INJECTING. Inject, expecting
firm backpressure, while withdrawing the needle. Expect to use about 1/3
to 1/2 of the drug volume per testicle leaving the organ firmly turgid.
Repeat for other testicle. The left over drug can/should be used to place
a dermal incisional block. The total time for this procedure should be 1
to 2 minutes. Drugs costs: 3 kg cat = $0.04; 55 kg dog = $0.65. Videos of
this procedure can be found at: http://www.vasg.org/intratesticular_blocks.htm.
Anticonvulsants - calcium
channel blockers originally developed as anticonvulsants have been shown
to be effective pain management tools with low side-effect profiles. In
the mid-1990s gabapentin was
found be an effective agent for the management of chronic neuropathic pain[iii],[iv].
More recently, studies in human patients have shown that preoperative oral
gabapentin can significantly reduce postoperative pain while reducing a
patient’s opioid requirement[v],[vi].
Pregabalin is a newer calcium channel blocker that holds promise for the
future but lacks inadequate support to warrant inclusion in this review.
Oral gabapentin dosed at 10 mg/kg 1 to 4 hours before surgery is an
attractive preoperative pain management tool for dogs and cats. The
patient benefit equals that of NSAIDs without the intraoperative blood
pressure concerns of the NSAIDs. Postoperative gabapentin has been shown
to be as effective as NSAIDs for human “spay” patients making it a
good selection for our patients intolerant of NSAIDs. Better yet, when our
patients are NSAID tolerant, we dispense 72 hours of gabapentin combined
with an NSAID. In human studies, patient groups given both drugs (versus
either drug alone) were the only group that reported 100% satisfaction
with their postoperative pain control. This short term gabapentin use also
translated into superior long term pain control (1 month postoperative)[vii],[viii]
,[ix]
,[x]
,[xi],[xii].
Constant
Rate Infusions have become a frequently utilized analgesic
delivery method. Delivering drugs via this route allows for a more
consistent drug delivery that avoids the peaks and valleys associated with
intermittent administration. CRIs also allow for much greater control of
the medication’s effects both positive and negative.
Drugs commonly delivered through CRIs include
morphine, hydromorphone, fentanyl, ketamine, midazolam, lidocaine, and
medetomidine. The opioids provide titratable analgesia that benefits the
patient at the peripheral and central levels. Nausea, clinically relevant
bradycardia and respiratory depression are not expected at normal
analgesic dose rates. Ketamine enhances analgesia via two different
mechanism; NMDA antagonism reducing central sensitization as well as a
direct analgesia via the D2 dopamine receptors. Midazolam provides
sedation and relaxation as well as a MAC sparing effect that can be of
major benefit for patients experiencing isoflurane or sevoflurane induced
hypotenion. Lidocaine is capable of enhancing analgesia while providing an
anti-inflammatory, reperfusion, and GI motility benefits. Medetomidine is
attractive as an anxiolytic as well as a tool for enhanced patient
analgesia in healthy patients.
CRIs can be delivered through the IV fluid bag route or directly through a
syringe pump. The IV fluid bag route is attractive because it allows for
precise delivery rates using equipment already available at most
practices. The simplest method involves a single fluid bag providing both
the drug delivery as well as the patient’s fluid needs. The downside to
this method is the inability to adjust the fluid rate without changing the
drug delivery rate. To maximize the flexibility of this method you
generally need to pick a midrange dose rate so that adjustments in patient
fluid need don’t take you outside of the preferred drug dose rates.
You can expand your flexibility by running two
separate fluid lines through two different IV fluid pumps. In the two-pump
model, the CRI drugs would be delivered at a very low rate (ex. 1
ml/kg/hr) while the patient’s additional fluid needs are separately
managed through the second line. This allows for total flexibility of drug
and fluid delivery but requires two pumps and double IV access.
While the calculations of the various CRI delivery
options may seem daunting, this headache has been eliminated by easy to
use calculators directly available online at www.vasg.org/resources_and_support_material.htm.
This calculator allows you to vary the IV fluid bag size, fluid delivery
rate, and drug dose rates to satisfy any conceivable combination.
Although the author does not recommend using gravity
administration for analgesic CRIs this is an option that may be
considered. The more current VASG calculators allow for the determination
of gravity delivered drip rates. Working through a buretrol, you maximize
control over drug delivery while also setting a limit to the maximum
amount of drug delivered.
Syringe pumps are the most ideal way to deliver CRI
drugs. Programmable syringe pumps like the Medfusion 2001 and 2010i may be
found on the secondary market for $500.00 to $1,000.00. The Razel
Scientific Company makes very solid volume delivery based syringe pumps
that cost $100.00 to $200.00 used and $550.00 to $800.00 new (http://www.razelscientific.com).
When starting to explore CRI use, running a single
agent ketamine CRI at 0.6 mg/kg/hr dose rate is a good start point. This
should enhance the preanesthetic opioid analgesia without having too
dramatic an effect on the overall patient appearance or inhalant agent
needs. After the staff has developed an initial comfort zone with ketamine
only CRIs consider adding lidocaine and morphine at the lower end of their
dose rate range. Gradually work up to midrange combinations of the three
drugs as the staff’s comfort zone expands, allowing the staff to see how
the inhalant needs of the average patient decline as the CRI drug effects
increase. The final step involves upper dose rate deliveries for the more
painful procedure expecting significant reductions in the patient’s
inhalant requirements.
Loading doses, which may well be included in the
preanesthetic and induction medications, should precede CRIs. Loading
doses are needed prior to the initiation of the CRI in order to achieve
initial therapeutic blood levels. Otherwise, it would take 3 to 5
half-lives of each drug to reach steady state drug levels.
CRIs are inexpensive tools. An 8 hour mid-dose rate
morphine/lidocaine/ketamine CRI for a 20 kg patient costs the practice less than $1.50 (drug costs). As with any
drug use, the suitability of a given drug infusion should be based on a
sound understanding of that drug’s use in a patient of that given health
status. It is beyond the scope of this review to discuss detailed drug
suitability issues.
|
Drug
|
Dose
rate mg/kg/hr
|
Loading
doses
|
|
Morphine*
|
0.12 to 0.36 mg/kg/hr
|
0.25 to 0.5 mg/kg IM or slowly IV
|
|
Hydromorphone*
|
0.024 to 0.072 mg/kg/hr
|
0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg IM or IV
|
|
Fentanyl*
|
0.0012 to 0.0048 mg/kg/hr
|
0.002 to 0.003 mg/kg IM or IV
|
|
Ketamine**
|
0.12 to 1.2 mg/kg/hr
|
0.25 to 0.5 mg/kg IV
|
|
Lidocaine***
|
0.6 to 3.0 mg/kg
|
0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg IV
|
|
Midazolam****
|
0.2 to 0.4 mg/kg/hr
|
0.2 to 0.4 mg/kg IV or IM
|
|
Medetomidine
|
0.0005 to 0.001 mg/kg/hr
|
0.001 mg/kg IM or IV
|
*
Any mu agonist opioid provides an adequate opioid loading dose.
**Telazol (tiletamine) provides an adequate ketamine
CRI loading dose.
***The author suggests the lower loading dose for cat
use and suggests that feline lidocaine CRIs be limited to 2 hours at upper
dose rates, 9 hours at lower dose rates.
****Diazepam would also provide an adequate loading
dose when initiating a midazolam CRI.
Transdermal Drug
Delivery has become an attractive delivery method for some of
our analgesic drugs. Transcutaneous patch delivery is available for
fentanyl, lidocaine, and buprenorphine. We may be tempted to think of
these as fire-and-forget analgesics. “Place a patch and you’re all
set” may seem alluring but it is a flawed strategy. Like all analgesic
methods, nothing works perfectly for all patients. A patch may allow for
continuous drug delivery over an extended period but there is tremendous
variability in the drug delivery through this route. A patch is best used
as a component in a more balanced strategy including additional drug
classes.
The fentanyl patch has been around for quite some
time. The branded Duragesic® patch has recently been joined by
generic patch options. Fentanyl patches can help provide patient pain
relief but they have limitations. Absorption studies have shown that a
significant percent of our patients fail to reach or sustain therapeutic
fentanyl blood levels[xiii].
Influences on drug variability include patient hypothermia and
hyperthermia, which can decrease or increase drug absorption respectively.
In dogs, the fentanyl patch may take 24 hours to reach full effect; in the
cat about 8 hours[xiv].
Ideally, the fentanyl patch should be supported by NSAID, tramadol (dogs),
transmucosal buprenorphine (cats), amantadine, or gabapentin use.
The lidocaine (Lidoderm®) patch has been
in use in veterinary medicine for many years. It is most effective when
applied adjacent to incisions or over injured areas providing a local, not
systemic, effect. Unlike the fentanyl patch, the lidocaine transdermal
patch can be cut to any shape. It can provide relief for 12 or more hours.
Ingestion of a lidocaine patch could cause serious lidocaine toxicity.
Whenever a lidocaine patch is used it must be securely protected by
appropriate bandaging and Elizabethan collar use.
Transdermal buprenorphine use is not currently well
supported. The human transdermal patch has not yet shown a therapeutic
benefit in animal trials. There are anecdotal reports of practitioners
having buprenorphine compounded in a PLO gel base for transdermal
delivery. These practitioners express positive opinions supporting this
route but there is, as yet, no research supporting this application.
Epidural Injections
provide a concentrated drug effect at the spinal cord level while,
generally, minimizing systemic drug effects. Opioids, alpha-2 agonists,
local anesthetics, midazolam, and ketamine have all been shown to benefit
the patient when administered epidurally. Lipophilic drugs have a more
rapid onset but they are more rapidly absorbed shortening their epidural
effect while exerting more systemic effects. Hydrophilic drugs have a
slower onset and longer duration with less systemic effect. Preservative
free products are preferred for epidural use but they are less readily
available and more expensive. Amongst the more common preservatives,
methylparaben is considered the least likely to cause adverse effects. The
use of products preserved with formaldehyde (which is the case with the
common US morphine preps) is not recommended.
Opiods and local anesthetics are the most commonly
used epidural drugs. Morphine and hydromorphone are the least lipohilic mu
agonists providing the longest duration of effect. Buprenorphine has also
been shown to be an effective analgesic when administered epidurally[xv],[xvi].
Fentanyl is not recommended; epidural administration is indistinguishable
from IV administration. Lidocaine, bupivacaine, and ropivocaine are the
most common epidurally placed local anesthetics. Lidocaine predictably
provides the most rapid block of the shortest duration. Bupivacaine and
ropivacaine provide longer lasting blocks but they do have a longer time
of onset for full block effect.
Remember spinal cord ends at L5-6 to L6-7 in dogs and
L7-S1 in cats. Place patient in sternal recumbancy with rear legs pulled
forward or in lateral recumbancy for certain fracture cases and when that
is your personal preference. Clip and prep area as you would for any
surgery. Use sterile gloves. If a drape is not used, the prepped area must
be larger. Draw up sterile saline in a “test” syringe (assistant
handles fluid bag). The test fluid volume should be different, smaller
volume than the medication syringe to prevent confusion.
Leave an air bubble in syringe to help in judging proper placement
at injection. Draw up the medication(s) aseptically in a second syringe
(assistant handles vials). If using glass ampoules, a sterile filter straw
should be used to remove glass particle contaminants. Make sure volume in
the medication syringe is clearly more than the test syringe to avoid
confusion. Leave an air bubble in the medication syringe to help in
judging proper placement at injection. Some prefer to use different size
syringes to decrease likelihood of switching the syringes in error. Some
prefer to use same size syringes to provide the exact same feel as the
test syringe.
Palpate the wings of the right and left ileum. The dorsal
spinous process of L7 should be even with an imaginary line drawn across
the dorsal iliac wings but can be just cranial or caudal to this line. The
needle should be introduced just caudal to L7. Place the needle through
the skin first, then place saline in hub for “hanging drop” technique.
Needle should encounter three fascial layers with the ligamentum flavum
being the final and most distinct pop. The saline in the needle hub should
be pulled into the needle when the epidural space is entered. If the drop
does not move but the feel suggests proper placement, proceed to test
injection. Perform test injection with saline syringe. Aspirate before
injecting. If blood is present withdraw needle, replace with new needle,
reassess landmarks, and begin again. If spinal fluid is present proceed
with injection but reduce the epidural medications volume by 50%. Inject
small amount of saline. The bubble in syringe should not compress during
injection. There should be no significant resistance to the injection.
Connect medication syringe. Reaspirate before injecting medications. There
should be no resistance to the injection. Withdraw needle.
Expect a 30 to 60 minute delay between epidural
injection and full epidural effect. Bupivacaine and ropivacaine provide up
to 6 hours of regional anesthesia and analgesia. Morphine, hydromorphone,
and buprenorphine provide up to 18 hours of regional analgesia.
|
Drug
|
Dose
|
|
Morphine
|
0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg
|
|
Hydromorphone
|
0.03 to 0.04 mg/kg
|
|
Bupivacaine
|
0.5 to 1 mg/kg
|
|
Ropivacaine
|
0.5 to 1 mg/kg
|
|
Ketamine
|
0.5 to 2 mg/kg
|
|
Medetomidine
|
0.005 mg/kg
|
Postoperative “to
go home” medication options offer a very broad range of
choices. As with perioperative analgesia, multimodal outpatient strategies
offer superior patient benefit while minimizing the likelihood of adverse
events.
Oral
(per os) choices include tramadol, amantadine, NSAIDs, and
gabapentin. TRAMADOL is a dual
mode analgesic. It is metabolized into 2 isomers each with different
analgesic benefit; one providing a mu agonist effect while the other
provides a monoamine reuptake inhibition analgesic effect. Tramadol is
available in relatively inexpensive 50 mg tablets. Tramadol is dosed at 1
to 5 mg/kg PO BID to QID. It is a bitter medication making it less well
suited to cat use unless the cat can be pilled with the tramadol placed in
a gelatin capsule. Tramadol is compatible with most other analgesic
medications but should be used cautiously, if at all, for patients on
SSRIs, TCAs, and MAOIs.
Amantadine provides
on ongoing NMDA antagonism that helps reduce the central sensitization
process. It is available in 100 mg capsules and a 10 mg/ml liquid. Dosing
ranges from 3 to 5 mg/kg PO SID. As amantadine is primarily excreted
unchanged through the kidneys, its dose should be reduced for patients in
renal failure. Although unlikely, signs of intolerance or excess dosing
include general agitation and diarrhea. As with tramadol, amantadine’s
bitter taste often limits its use in cats.
While NSAIDs are usually well tolerated drugs as a
class, they are not without potential for GI upset as well as liver and
renal concerns. Healthy patients usually tolerate 5 to 7 days of an NSAID
without adverse effects. NSAID can be coordinated with tramadol,
amantadine, and gabapentin if needed for more complex pain. Remember that
patients may respond and tolerate certain NSAIDs better than others. Only
trial and error can predict the best choice for a given patient.
Postoperative NSAID use in cats has limited options.
There are no oral NSAIDs currently approved in the US for the cat. That
being said, many veterinarians are using the meloxicam liquid for long
term use in cats. After an initial dose of 0.1 mg/kg PO for 3 to 5 days,
the dose is reduced to 0.1 mg total dose PO
SID every 24 to 72 hours if long term use is required. For accurate dosing
it is recommended that a Tb syringe be used to draw up the exact drug
volume. The injectable Metacam® product is currently labeled
for a one time dose of 0.3 mg/kg (0.14 mg/lb) SC. Oral dosing following this
injectable dose is not recommended.
Gabapentin
has a broad dose range; 1 to 10 mg/kg PO BID to TID. The least expensive
options include the generic 100 mg, 300 mg, 600 mg, and 800 mg tablets. It
is also available in a 50 mg/ml liquid. Cats are generally reasonably
accepting of gabapentin compounded in a cat friendly flavored base.
Gabapentin can be used for 3 to 5 days after less painful procedures,
longer term especially for major procedures like amputations. Gabapentin
is a very useful post-declaw medication for cats preferably teamed with
buprenorphine TM and meloxicam PO.
Butorphanol
and buprenorphine are not logical oral (per os) analgesics. Mixing
either of these drugs with an antibiotic or flavored liquid is not
recommended. The enterohepatic first-pass effect renders 80% to 90% of
these opioids ineffective. As noted earlier, even when properly dosed,
butorphanol provides only mild analgesia of short duration. For example -
a 20 kilogram dog would require 20 mg of butorphanol every hour to sustain
a mild but very costly analgesic effect. Buprenorphine could theoretically
provide effective analgesia via the oral route. However, the 80 to 90%
loss via the first-pass effect means that it would need to be dosed at
such a high oral dose it would make oral buprenorphine unaffordable. There
are much, much better choices outlined above.
Transmucosal
(TM) drug delivery is a very attractive route as it bypasses
the enterohepatic first-pass effect and it often easier to administer a
small volume of liquid inside the cheekpouch of a cat compared to pilling
a cat multiple times a day. Buprenorphine has been shown to be absorbed
efficiently through the oral mucosa of the cat. Bioavailability is the
same TM as IV in the cat. The pH of the dog’s oral cavity reduces the
bioavailability of TM buprenorphine in that species. Until studies are
performed TM buprenorphine use in the dog is not recommended.
Transdermal
choices include
fentanyl and lidocaine patches as outlined above. These tools are quite
attractive when managing a patient poorly tolerant or very resistant to
oral medications. These patches can be used in combination with the above
oral medications including tramadol. In general, it is unwise to depend on
patch-based analgesia as the only patient analgesic tool.
PATIENT
SUPPORT plays a significant role in the overall tolerance of
many of our perioperative pain medications and strategies. Effective body
temperature support increases drug metabolism improving the patient’s
rate of recovery and drug tolerance. Circulating warm water blankets with
warm air warming systems (Bair Hugger®, Warmtouch®)
maximize body temperature support. Electric
heating pads and microwaved rice or oat bags continue to be the source of
many very severe patient burns and are not recommended.
Circulating ice water chiller systems like the Cryo/cuff®
are excellent postoperative tools for minimizing joint swelling and
discomfort. Rehabilitation/physiotherapy incorporated into the immediate
postoperative period can help maximize the rate and quality of the
patient’s recovery.
LAST
BUT NOT LEAST, surgical technique goes a long way towards
influencing postoperative pain, particularly chronic pain which is most
commonly neuropathic in nature. Minimize unnecessary nerve trauma through
optimal anatomic knowledge and surgical technique.
In a recent human postsurgical review of persistent
pain following groin hernia
repair, breast and thoracic surgery, leg amputation, and coronary artery
bypass surgery up to 50% of the patients experienced pain lasting greater
than 3 to 6 months after surgery[xvii].
Up to 10% of these patients experience severe persistent postsurgical
pain. The intensity of the acute postoperative pain correlates with the
risk of chronic postop pain.
Because
of the neuroanatomic and neurophysiologic similarities between animal and
human patients there is every reason to assume that veterinary patients
have similar chronic pain tendencies. Clearly, early aggressive pain
management is in the best interests of the patient reducing both the acute
postoperative pain and the risk of chronic postoperative pain.
In
the next and final installment, strategies for specific procedures will be
discussed.
[i] Bazin JE, Massoni C,
Bruelle P, Fenies V, Groslier D, Schoeffler P. The
addition of opioids to local anaesthetics in brachial plexus block:
the comparative effects of morphine, buprenorphine and sufentanil. Anaesthesia.
1997 Sep;52(9):858-62.
[ii] Candido KD, Winnie AP,
Ghaleb AH, Fattouh MW, Franco CD. Buprenorphine added to the local
anesthetic for axillary brachial plexus block prolongs postoperative
analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002 Mar-Apr;27(2):162-7.
[iii] Wong,
JO, Tan TD, Tseng KF, Cheu NW, Wu JH. Gabapentin for the
treatment of chronic intractable neuropathic pain: a long-term
follow-up study. The Pain Clinic, Volume 17, Number 4, 2005, pp.
357-365(9)
[iv] Gilron I, Watson CP,
Cahill CM, Moulin DE. Neuropathic pain: a practical guide for the
clinician. CMAJ. 2006 Aug 1;175(3):265-75. Review.
[v] Hurley RW, Cohen SP,
Williams KA, Rowlingson AJ, Wu CL. The analgesic effects of
perioperative gabapentin on postoperative pain: a meta-analysis. Reg
Anesth Pain Med. 2006 May-Jun;31(3):237-47.
[vi] Ho KY, Gan TJ, Habib AS.
Gabapentin and postoperative pain - a systematic review of randomized
controlled trials. Pain. 2006 Jul 15
[vii] Rorarius MG, Mennander S,
Suominen P, Rintala S, Puura A, Pirhonen R, Salmelin R, Haanpaa M,
Kujansuu E, Yli-Hankala A. Gabapentin for the prevention of
postoperative pain after vaginal hysterectomy. Pain. 2004
Jul;110(1-2):175-81.
[viii] Dierking G, Duedahl TH,
Rasmussen ML, Fomsgaard JS, Moiniche S, Romsing J, Dahl JB. Effects of
gabapentin on postoperative morphine consumption and pain after
abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized, double-blind trial. Acta
Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004 Mar;48(3):322-7.
[ix] Turan A, Karamanlioglu B,
Memis D, Usar P, Pamukcu Z, Ture M. The analgesic effects of
gabapentin after total abdominal hysterectomy. Anesth Analg. 2004
May;98(5):1370-3, table of contents.
[x]
Gilron I, Orr E, Tu D, O'Neill JP, Zamora JE, Bell AC. A
placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of perioperative
administration of gabapentin, rofecoxib and their combination for
spontaneous and movement-evoked pain after abdominal hysterectomy.
Pain. 2005 Jan;113(1-2):191-200.
[xi] Turan A, White PF,
Karamanlioglu B, Memis D, Tasdogan M, Pamukcu Z, Yavuz E. Gabapentin:
an alternative to the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors for perioperative
pain management. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jan;102(1):175-81.
[xii] Fassoulaki A, Stamatakis
E, Petropoulos G, Siafaka I, Hassiakos D, Sarantopoulos C. Gabapentin
attenuates late but not acute pain after abdominal hysterectomy. Eur J
Anaesthesiol. 2006 Feb;23(2):136-41.
[xiii] Lee DD, Papich MG,
Hardie EM. Comparison of pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after
intravenous and transdermal administration in cats. Am J Vet Res. 2000
Jun;61(6):672-7.
[xiv] Hofmeister EH, Egger CM.
Transdermal fentanyl patches in small animals. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc.
2004 Nov-Dec;40(6):468-78.
[xv] Smith
LJ, Yu JK. A
comparison of epidural buprenorphine with epidural morphine for
postoperative analgesia following stifle surgery in dogs.
Vet
Anaesth Analg. 2001
Apr;
28(2): 87
[xvi] Miwa Y, Yonemura E,
Fukushima K. Epidural administered buprenorphine in the perioperative
period. Can J Anaesth. 1996 Sep;43(9):907-13.
[xvii] Kehlet H, Jensen TS,
Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention.
Lancet. 2006 May 13;367(9522):1618-25.
|